Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers

I-Guidelines for Authors

Uirtus welcomes submissions in the fields of the arts and humanities. The journal publishes articles, notes (short articles), and book reviews.

Issues
We publish three issues annually (April, August, and December)
Submissions are expected on:
     • February 28/29 for the April issue
     • June 30 for the August issue
     • October 31 for the December issue

Article Types and Length

  • Articles: Should ideally be approximately 6,250 words, including endnotes and works cited.
  • Notes (Short Articles): Should not exceed 2,500 words, including endnotes and works cited.

Submission Guidelines

  • Language: Submissions are accepted in both English and French.
  • Formatting: Manuscripts should be prepared following the guidelines of the eighth edition of the Modern Language Association (MLA) Manual of Style. A summary of the MLA standards is available for download on the journal’s website.
  • Content: The journal welcomes all critical approaches, from the most traditional to the most advanced. However, it generally does not publish fiction, poetry, or other writing that is not the subject of academic research.
  • Writing Quality: Uirtus values and publishes technically correct and stylistically graceful writing. The journal believes that academic prose should be pleasant to read and crystal clear.

Submission Process

  • How to Submit: Manuscripts should be submitted via email to [email protected].
  • Review Process: Upon submission, manuscripts undergo a preliminary assessment by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the journal’s scope and meet quality standards. Suitable manuscripts are then sent for double-blind peer review, where they are evaluated by at least two experts in the relevant field.
  • Decision Notification: Authors will be notified of the editorial decision, along with any reviewer comments, within a reasonable timeframe.

Plagiarism Detection

Uirtus maintains a strict policy against plagiarism in all submitted works. The journal expects all authors to submit original research, and any form of plagiarism—whether self-plagiarism or the use of others’ work without proper citation—will not be tolerated.

  • Manuscripts may be checked using plagiarism detection software.
  • Any manuscript found to contain plagiarized material will be rejected, and the author may be banned from submitting future work to the journal.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that all sources are appropriately credited and cited, and that they adhere to academic integrity standards.

Licensing and Copyright Terms

Uirtus is an open-access journal, ensuring that all published content is freely accessible to readers worldwide.

  • Licensing Terms: Authors retain copyright of their work and grant Uirtus the right to publish the article. The specific licensing terms, including any Creative Commons licenses applied, are detailed on the journal’s website.
  • Copyright Terms: Authors are responsible for ensuring that their submissions do not infringe upon any existing copyrights. Any use of third-party material within the manuscript must be appropriately credited and accompanied by necessary permissions.

Author Charges

Uirtus charges the following fees for authors:

  • Submission Fee: 30 USD
    • This fee is required at the time of manuscript submission to cover administrative costs associated with the initial review and processing of the manuscript.
  • Article Processing Fee (APC): 70 USD
    • This fee applies upon acceptance of the manuscript for publication and covers the cost of peer review, editing, formatting, and open-access publication of the article.
  • Payment Details: Instructions for payment will be provided upon submission. Proof of payment must be included with the manuscript submission.
  • Waivers & Discounts: Currently, Uirtus does not offer waivers or discounts for submission fees.

II-Reviewer Guidelines

     1.Introduction

Thank you for agreeing to review for Uirtus, a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing research in the Arts and Humanities. Your expertise ensures the quality and credibility of our publications. We value constructive, fair, and timely feedback that helps authors refine their work.

  1. Peer Review Model
  • Uirtus follows a double-blind peer review process.
  • Reviewers must not disclose their identity to authors.
  • Reviewers should declare any conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.
  1. Review Criteria

Reviewers should evaluate submissions based on the following:

  • Originality & Contribution
  • Does the paper present new insights, perspectives, or findings?
  • Is it relevant to current debates in the Arts and Humanities?
  • Theoretical & Methodological Rigor
  • Is the theoretical framework sound and well-articulated?
  • Are the research methods appropriate, well-explained, and reliable?
  • Argumentation & Clarity
  • Does the paper develop a clear, coherent, and logical argument?
  • Are claims well-supported with evidence and references?
  • Structure & Organization
  • Does the manuscript follow a logical flow (introduction, literature review, analysis, conclusion)?
  • Is it well-structured and easy to follow?
  • Language & Style
  • Is the paper written in clear, academic language?
  • Are there grammatical or stylistic issues that hinder readability?
  • Referencing & Ethical Compliance
  • Are sources properly cited using the required citation style (MLA)?
  • Are there any ethical concerns (plagiarism, misrepresentation of data, conflicts of interest)?
  1. Review Process & Recommendations

4.1. Steps for Review

  • Read the manuscript thoroughly and assess it using the criteria above.
  • Provide constructive feedback—highlight strengths and suggest improvements.
  • Submit a review report using the journal’s review form or structured comments.

4.2. Reviewer Recommendations

After evaluation, reviewers should recommend one of the following:

🔹 Accept as is – The paper meets all criteria and requires no changes.
🔹 Accept with minor revisions – The paper is strong but needs slight improvements.
🔹 Revise and resubmit – The paper has potential but requires substantial changes.
🔹 Reject – The paper does not meet the journal’s standards.

  1. Ethical Responsibilities

Reviewers must:

  • Maintain confidentiality—manuscripts should not be shared or discussed.
  • Avoid bias and conflicts of interest—notify the editor if a conflict exists.
  • Provide objective and respectful feedback—avoid personal criticism.
  • Report ethical concerns—flag potential plagiarism, data fabrication, or misconduct.
  1. Review Timeline & Submission
  • Reviews should be completed within 2 weeks from acceptance.
  • If more time is needed, reviewers should inform the editorial team.
  • Reviews should be submitted via the journal’s online system or email.
  1. Acknowledgment & Benefits
  • Reviewers contribute to advancing scholarly research and maintaining high standards.
  • Regular reviewers may be recognized on the journal website and considered for editorial board invitations.
  • Reviewers receive certificates of appreciation upon request.
  1. Contact Information

For any questions, please contact the editorial team at:
[email protected] or [email protected]
🌐 https://uirtus.net

Comments are closed.